Mr. Mauk surveyed 50 high school students in his driver-education course to determine how many times most motorists have taken a driver-education course. Which of the following best explains why the results of Mr. Mauk's survey may NOT be valid? F He did not include motorists from other driver-education courses.
G He should have included adults who have taken driver-education courses.
H He should have included taxi drivers in his survey.
J The sample used in his survey may not have been representative of most motorists.​

, and

for

step-by-step explanation:

we can analyze the pattern at which the terms increase. let us denote , , , so that we can call

note the following:

the pattern: to get the next term value, we just add the next term number (e.g. 1st, 2nd, to the previous term value (term values are the given numbers in the question, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15,

from , to get to , we add

from , to get to , we add

etc.

we need to form a recursive formula, a formula that has the next term as a function of the previous term. so a possible recursive formula can be

, and for

answer: 0.26

i used the calculator on google

i love jeffery and believe there is truth in tati and james' answers

step-by-step explanation:

yes i have heard the tea

i believe both

no, tati didnt over exaggerate

james might might idk and tbh dont rly care