Which statement correctly explains whether lim n(x) exists?
X-9
O The limit does not exist because the values of h(x)
seem to oscillate between random values around x =
9.
O The limit does exist because h(x) is defined for all
given values around x = 9, even though h(x) isn't
defined at x = 9.
O The limit does not exist because h(x) is not defined at
x = 9, and for a limit to exist, the function must be
defined at x = 9.
O The limit does exist because the values of h(x) to the
right of x = 9 are all opposites of the values of h(x) to
the left of x = 9.

i dont know

step-by-step explanation:

5 pm

step-by-step explanation:

well we know there are 4 clubs in 52 cards so it’s replaced so it should be 3/51

step-by-step explanation:

85.560%

step-by-step explanation:

conditional probability is defined as:

p(a|b) = p(a∩b) / p(b)

in other words, the probability that a occurs, given that b has occurred = the probability that both a and b occur / the probability that b occurs.

in this example:

p(turns 64 | turns 44) = p(turns 64 & turns 44) / p(turns 44).

if someone turns 64, they must have already turned 44, so:

p(turns 64 | turns 44) = p(turns 64) / p(turns 44)

on page 42, we see that of the original 100,000, 94944 turn 44, and 81234 turn 64.   therefore:

p(turns 64 | turns 44) = 81234 / 94944

p(turns 64 | turns 44) = 0.85560