Peter is the owner of a hardware supply shop. He has hired you to check his machines calibration prior to starting production on a large order. To check this, you set the machine to create 2.0 inch nails and manufacture a random sample of 200 nails. That sample of nails has an average length of 2.024 inches with a standard deviation of 0.205 inches. Does this sample provide convincing evidence that the machine is working properly or should it be shut down for repairs?

If we compare the p value and the significance level assumed we see thatso we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL reject the null hypothesis, so we can conclude that the true mean is not different from the specification at 1% of signficance.  

Step-by-step explanation:

c > -10.55

step-by-step explanation:

guess at question:

a vertical line intersects the graph of g(x,y) = 0 at two points. what conclusion follows about the function f(x) implicitly defined by g(x,f(x)) = 0?

the domain of f(x) cannot include the x coordinate of any such vertical line.

informally, f(x) is not a function, and

g(x,y)=0 cannot be solved for y uniquely.

the relation r = {(x,y) such that g(x,y) = 0} is a function if

for all (a,b) ∊ r and (c,d) ∊ r, a=c implies b=d.

step-by-step explanation: