subject
Mathematics, 13.03.2021 04:20 deja163

A) chaim used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles. B) chaim only established some of the necessary conditions for a congruence criterion.

C) chaim established all necessary conditions, but then used an inappropriate congruence criterion.

D) chaim used a criterion that does not guarantee congruence.

Plz help​


A) chaim used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles.

B) chaim

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:30
Factor the expression using the gcf. the expression 21m−49n factored using the gcf
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 03:00
At the beginning of the year, adrian's savings account balance was \$28$28. each week, he deposits another \$15$15 into that account, and he doesn't spend any of his savings. is his savings account balance proportional to the number of weeks since the start of the year?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 05:30
What is the solution to the system of equations? 10x+3y=8 -9x-y=-20 (11, 1) (1, 11) (–1, 11) (11, –1)'
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 05:30
How can you use equivalent fractions to know that 43/200 is between 1/5 and 1/4?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
A) chaim used an invalid reason to justify the congruence of a pair of sides or angles. B) chaim on...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 13.03.2021 01:00
question
Chemistry, 13.03.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 13.03.2021 01:00
Questions on the website: 13722361