Pythagorean Theorem: a^2 + b^2 = c^2 Question 6 options:

No. Since 7^2+9^2≠11^2, the triangle cannot be a right triangle.

Yes. Since 7^2+9^2=11^2, the triangle must be a right triangle.

Yes. Since7^2+9^2≠11^2, the triangle must be a right triangle.

No. Since 7^2+9^2=11^2, the triangle cannot be a right triangle.

9514 1404 393

  No. Since 7^2 + 9^2 ≠ 11^2, the triangle cannot be a right triangle.

Step-by-step explanation:

You may recall that side lengths of 3, 4, 5 make a right triangle. That particular triple has several interesting characteristics. One is that it is the only (reduced) triple that is an arithmetic sequence (has a constant difference between the side lengths). Any right triangle that has sides that differ by a constant amount must be a multiple of 3, 4, 5.

Here, we have sides of length 7, 9, 11—values that differ by 2. They form an arithmetic sequence that is not a multiple of 3, 4, 5, so we know right away they cannot be sides of a right triangle.

__

If we want to use the Pythagorean relation to check, we can see if the equation is true:

  7² + 9² = 11²

  49 + 81 = 121

  130 = 121 . . . . . . Not True

the answer is b.

step-by-step explanation:

i think it's eleven too, don't woosh me here, but according to the "experts" it's 2.

the proof starts from the peano postulates, which define the natural

numbers n. n is the smallest set satisfying these postulates:

  p1.   1 is in n.

  p2.   if x is in n, then its "successor" x' is in n.

  p3.   there is no x such that x' = 1.

  p4.   if x isn't 1, then there is a y in n such that y' = x.

  p5.   if s is a subset of n, 1 is in s, and the implication

      (x in s => x' in s) holds, then s = n.

then you have to define addition recursively:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 1, then define a + b = a'

      (using p1 and p2). if b isn't 1, then let c' = b, with c in n

      (using p4), and define a + b = (a + c)'.

then you have to define 2:

  def:   2 = 1'

2 is in n by p1, p2, and the definition of 2.

theorem:   1 + 1 = 2

proof: use the first part of the definition of + with a = b = 1.

      then 1 + 1 = 1' = 2   q.e.d.

note: there is an alternate formulation of the peano postulates which

replaces 1 with 0 in p1, p3, p4, and p5. then you have to change the

definition of addition to this:

  def: let a and b be in n. if b = 0, then define a + b = a.

      if b isn't 0, then let c' = b, with c in n, and define

      a + b = (a + c)'.

you also have to define 1 = 0', and 2 = 1'. then the proof of the

theorem above is a little different:

proof: use the second part of the definition of + first:

      1 + 1 = (1 + 0)'

      now use the first part of the definition of + on the sum in

      parentheses:   1 + 1 = (1)' = 1' = 2   q.e.d.