HELP .,...,,.

6. Not similar.

7. Not similar.

8. Not similar.

Step-by-step explanation:

6. Reduce all ratios to simplest form 16:20 = 4:5 ; 12:15 = 4:5 ; 20:26 = 10:13 not all of the sides follow the same ratio, so the triangles are not similar.  

7. None of the side lengths are shown. You can find the missing angles of the triangle however, only one of the angles is congruent to the other, so the triangles are not similar.

8. We know that 2 of the sides of each triangle are congruent, and the angle in between the sides are also congruent, which follows the SAS similarity conjecture. However, given that the sides are congruent, not similar in ratio, I can conclude that the triangles are congruent, not similar.

PS. It would mean the world to me if you could mark me brainliest!

Side note- I am not a professional, I just have done this a few months in the past! Best of luck!

part 1 answer = 8

part 2 answer = 72

step-by-step explanation:

part 1 explanation = add all of the numbers, then divide by how many numbers you have. so, 200/25 = 8.

part 2 explanation = not gonna lie, this is hard to explain, so just google how to do it.

hope this .

r3t40