Seth claims that changing the value of a in quadratic relations of the form will never result in a parabola that is congruent to the parabola . Do you agree or disagree? Justify your decision.

it should be a and d. lmk if i'm wrong xd

p ÷ r = tan(x)

step-by-step explanation:

given that there is a figure below shows a right triangle: a right triangle is shown with hypotenuse equal to q units and the length of the legs equal to p units and r units.

graph is missing so i will create the graph as per given information.

the angle between the legs having lengths p units and q units is y degrees. the angle between the legs having lengths r units and q units is x degrees.

now we need to find about what is p ÷ r equal to.

so we can use trigonometric ratio tan(x)=[altitude]/[base] to find the value of p ÷ r, because p is the altitude and r is the base.

p ÷ r=tan(x)

hence final answer is p ÷ r=tan(x).

the arc length is found by finding the circumference of the full circle (2xpixradius) and then dividing by 4 to find just one quarter of the circle (90 degrees).

wth is with the little mtn top and what are you talking about like fix your words and accually make sence with them and i like was in a completly different question like three times like it seems like your ilitteret