Which scenario is a counterexample that disproves the AAA criteria for congruence? Two 45°−45°−90° triangles that share a diagonal to form a square
Two 45 degrees minus 45 degrees minus 90 degrees triangles that share a diagonal to form a square

Two right triangles with hypotenuses that are 6 in and 8 in
Two right triangles with hypotenuses that are 6 in and 8 in

Two isosceles triangles with bases of 2 ft and 7 ft
Two isosceles triangles with bases of 2 ft and 7 ft

Two equilateral triangles with side lengths of 4 cm and 10 cm

it is probably the graph on the bottom right.

step-by-step explanation:

f(x)=2x^2 -1 

translation is a function transformation that transform the function in a way of translating. by translating the function its graph is moved  up an down. moving the function f(x) 2 units to the left will be the new function g(x) with the equation: g(x)=f(x+2)=2(x+2)^2 -1

let's cover over the formula of the vertex:

y = a(x – h)^2 + k

in this formula, (h,k) are the vertex, always remember that the positive or negative value of the vertex is based on the sign it has.

for example, if the vertex is -3,-6 then both the x and y value would have the positive sign attached to it and if it were a positive x and y value, then a negative sign would be attached to it.

with that being said, for our problem the x value is a positive one so we are looking for a number with a negative sign next to it, in this case the first and second choice.

however, for the first answer choice it isn't quite part of the formula so we know that the answer choice correctly displays the x value.

to confirm, we can see if the -1 fits correctly with the second answer choice, and as mentioned above a negative number will have a positive sign attached to it. so, for our problem we can see that -1 has been changed to +1, so we can confirm that the second answer choice is correct.

hence, our final answer is y=(x - 1)^2 + 1

step-by-step explanation:

; fx