0.95 0.61 5/8 least to greatest from

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Match each equation with the operation you can use to solve for the variable. subtract 10. divide by 10. divide by 5. subtract 18. multiply by 10. add 18. add 10. multiply by 5. 5 = 10p arrowright p + 10 = 18 arrowright p + 18 = 5 arrowright 5p = 10 arrowright

The trigonometric ratios sine and secant are reciprocals of each other