THIS IS EASY!! PLS HELP ME! ASAP PLS Eliza claims that the two squares are congruent. Which statement could be used to prove Eliza's claim?

A) Any two squares are congruent since all squares have angles of 90 degrees

B) The two squares are congruent since a translation carries one square onto the other.

C) Any two squares are congruent since all four sides of any square are congruent.

D) The two squares are congruent since a rotation about the origin carries one square onto the other.

Eliza claims that the two squares are congruent. The statement that could be used to prove Eliza's claim can be found in Option A.

Any two squares are congruent since all squares have angles of 90 degrees.

A figure is said to be congruent if they have similar angles and the position of each shape corresponds to each other.

From the given figure attached to the question, we can see that the two shapes in the figure are squares, and they are located at 2 units each from the origin. The angles of each shape are 90° to the horizontal line and they are perpendicular to each other.

The two squares may not be congruent since not only translation carries one square onto the other, from the figure in the question, it may be a reflection and not only translation.

Also, only the sides of a shape cannot be used as a determining factor to determine if a shape is congruent or not.

Therefore, we can conclude that any two squares are congruent since all squares have angles of 90 degrees.

Learn more about congruent angles here:

link

A

Step-by-step explanation:

I Hope this helps you out!

d) 48

step-by-step explanation:

16,32,48,64,80,96,112,128,144,160,176,192,208,224,240,256,272,288,304,320,336

f(x)=2/3x+4/3 is the answer because is whose power in the senate is equal to the power of the speaker of the house?

step-by-step explanation: