I’m confused on how I can prove number 1 and 2, unless T is the median idk

Problem 1

We're given that QE = RW and QW = RE. This is given both in terms of symbols, and also visually in terms of the tickmarks. We have two pairs of congruent sides.

The third pair of sides is the overlapping shared segment of segment WE. So WE = WE by the reflexive property.

From here we use the SSS congruence property to conclude the proof that triangle QWE = triangle REW

Problem 2

Segments BC and AE bisect each other. The term "bisect" means "to cut in half".

BC bisecting AE means AD = DE

AE bisecting BC means BD = DC

So we have two pairs of congruent sides. So far, we're on a similar path compared to problem 1. This time however, we'll use a pair of congruent angles instead of the third pair of sides.

Specifically we'll use the fact that

angle ADB = angle CDE

by the vertical angle theorem

Once we know that, we then use the SAS congruence theorem to prove triangle ABD = triangle ECD

To be honest, I'm not sure what you meant by "median", but we don't use any triangle medians here (none of the triangles shown have any medians drawn). You might be thinking of a previous problem.

$2416.6

step-by-step explanation:

per hour = $ 25

total work time = 35

commission = 15%

total she has to make = $ 4,500

let she sold x dollar products

so her commission will be 15 % of x

now

total = weekly basic pay + commission

4500= (25*35) + 15 % of x

4500=875 + * x

4500-875 =   * x

3625= * x

multiplying wwith 100 on both sides gives

36250 = 15 x

now

x =  

x= $2416.6