Jennifer says the quadrilaterals below must be congruent because their angles are congruent. Is she correct?

I've attached the complete question withe the 2 quadrilaterals.

Jennifer is not correct because equal angles alone is not a proof of congruency.

Step-by-step explanation:

Now, in test for congruence, we use any of the following criteria;

SSS: Side - Side - Side

SAS: Side - Angle - Side

ASA: Angle - Side - Angle

AAS: Angle - Angle - Side

RHS: Right angle - Hypotenuse - Side

The assumption in the question is that all the angles are equal to determine that the quadrilaterals are congruent.

However, we don't use AAA(Angle - Angle - Angle theorem) as a congruence proof because it's very possible to have all the internal angles equal and yet all the corresponding sides don't have the same length.

Thus, Jeniffer is not correct.

your answer is a

step-by-step explanation:

plzplzplzplzplz mark brainliest i need it.

the equation cos(35) =a/25 can be used to find the length of bc what is the length of bc? round to the nearest tenth

step-by-step explanation: