Vance used the associative property to write (4.5 m + StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction) minus 9 as the equivalent expression 4.5 m (StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction minus 9). Did Vance apply the associative property correctly? Why or why not? Yes, the terms with variables should be written first.
Yes, the terms can be regrouped and still be equivalent.
No, the order of the terms should have been changed.
No, the addition symbol was dropped in the second expression.

Drag and drop the answers into the boxes to complete this informal argument explaining how to derive the formula for the volume of a cone. since the volume of a cone is part of the volume of a cylinder with the same base and height, find the volume of a cylinder first. the base of a cylinder is a circle. the area of the base of a cylinder is , where r represents the radius. the volume of a cylinder can be described as slices of the base stacked upon each other. so, the volume of the cylinder can be found by multiplying the area of the circle by the height h of the cylinder. the volume of a cone is of the volume of a cylinder. therefore, the formula for the volume of a cone is 1/3 1/2 1/3πr^2h 1/2πr^2h πr^2h πr^2

If jm equals 5x -8 and lm equals 2x -6 which expression represents jl

Find the difference (8ab+a+2) - (3ab+6)