Kate solved an equation incorrectly, as shown below: Step 1: 9x = 72
Step 2: x = 72 − 9
Step 3: x = 63

Which statement best explains why Step 2 is incorrect in Kate's solution? (1 point)

She did not multiply 72 nine times.
She did not multiply 72 by 9.
She did not add 9 to 72.
She did not divide 72 by 9.

Mexico city, mexico, is the world's second largest metropolis and is also one of its fastest-growing cities with a projected growth rate of 3.2% per year. its population in 1991 was 20,899,000 people. use the formula p = 20.899e0.032t to predict its population p in millions with t equal to the number of years after 1991. what is the predicted population to the nearest thousand of mexico city for the year 2010?

If the table of the function contains exactly two potential turning points, one with an input value of –1, which statement best describes all possible values of m? m ≥ –12 –12 < m < 4 m ≤ 4 m ≥ 4 or m ≤ –12

If you answer 2+2 you will get over 80 points