Hurryyy!! Otero translated the phrase "three less than a number" into the expression 3 - X. Which best describes the accuracy of Otero's expression?
It is accurate. The phrase can be translated as "three" = 3, "less than" = subtraction, and "a number" = X, SO 3- X is
the correct expression.
It is inaccurate. Three is being subtracted from a number, so X-3 is what he should have written.
It is inaccurate. Three is being compared to a number, so 3 It is inaccurate. Three is being added to a number, so 3+ x is what he should have written.

A. It is accurate. The phrase can be translated as “three” = 3, “less than” = subtraction, and “a number” = x, so 3-x is the correct expression.

Step-by-step explanation:

See below

Step-by-step explanation:

On Edge 2020 it is B.

It is inaccurate. Three is being subtracted from a number, so x minus 3 is what he should have written.

answer: 0+0=0

step-by-step explanation:

that is the only answer that can make 0

7 weeks

step-by-step explanation:

convert each fraction to the least common multiple of 20, so 3/4 = 15/20 & 1/10 = 2/20, then divide 15 by 2 and you get a little over 7, so the food will last 7 weeks.