In a survey of 2,000 people who owned a certain type of car, 1,300 said they would buy that type of car again. What percent of the people surveyed were satisfied with the car?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

35 points, ! name one pair of congruent sides. a. segments pr and sv b. segments qr and st c. segments rp and ts d. segments pq and vs

Which is the graph of the piecewise function f(x)? f(x)=[tex]f(x) = \left \{ {{-x+1, x\leq 0 } \atop {x+1, x\ \textgreater \ 0}} \right.[/tex]