Xavier said that the recursive formula for this sequence could be described as, "to find the next term of the sequence, add -3
to the previous term." Do you agree or disagree that this
statement is equivalent to the explicit formula from question
18? Explain.

Answer

The answer is in the step by step explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

YOU ARE LAZY TO FIND AN ANSWER ON YOUR OWN SO GET OUT OF HERE CHEATING LIL KID

answer: solve 5\cdot 2^x=2405⋅2  

x

=2405, dot, 2, start superscript, x, end superscript, equals, 240.

solution

to solve for xxx, we must first isolate the exponential part. to do this, divide both sides by 555 as shown below. we do not multiply the 555 and the 222 as this goes against the order of operations!

\begin{aligned} 5\cdot 2^x& =240 2^x& =48 \\ \end{aligned}  

5⋅2  

x

2  

x

​    

=240

=48

​

step-by-step explanation:

isn't it a pentagon? sense [3 (triangle) + 4 (rectangle)] - 2 (triangle and rectangle connected) = 5 (pentagon)