Answers: 2
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:00
Polygon hh is a scaled copy of polygon gg using a scale factor of 1/4. polygon h's area is what fraction of polygon g's area?
Answers: 3
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
What is the explicit formula for this sequence? -7, -4, -1, 2, a.) an = 8 + (b - 1)3 b.) an = -7 + (n - 1)3 c.) an = 3 + (n -1) (-7) d.) an = -7 + (n - )
Answers: 1
341 base5 divided by 22 base5...
Mathematics, 12.03.2020 06:12
Mathematics, 12.03.2020 06:12
Mathematics, 12.03.2020 06:12
Biology, 12.03.2020 06:13
Mathematics, 12.03.2020 06:13