I need help pls help I’m almost out of time

Juliana says that she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6: 10. which statement explains whether juliana is correct? she is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio. she is correct because 6: 10 can be written as 1: 2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1: 2. she is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10. she is not correct because 6: 10 is equivalent to 3: 5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3: 5.

Triangle abc has side lengths: ab = 3.5  cm, bc = 2.4 cm, and ac = 4.2 cmδabc ≅ δhjkwhat is the length of side hj?

Three runners competed in a race data were collected at each mile mark for each runner if the runner ran at a constant pace the data would be linear