HELP PLEASE! 20 POINTS AND WILL MARK BRAINLIEST. Suppose you want to find the 40th term of a sequence. Would you rather use a recursive rule or an explicit rule? Explain your reasoning.

I'd rather use an explicit rule for bigger values of n

Step-by-step explanation:

Suppose we have a sequence like:

6,14,22,30,..

And we wanted to calculate the 200th term. The recursive rule is:

Since each term is 8 more than the previous term. If we wanted to caclulate the term n=200, we would need to go up to 200 one-by-one until reaching the desired value.

The explicit rule is:

To find the term for n=200, just substitute into the rule:

Thus, I'd rather use an explicit rule for bigger values of n

answer: -2+√x,-2-√x

i hope this , i don't know if you're looking for a pair or not.

option: d is the correct answer.

d) none of the above.

step-by-step explanation:

clearly from the figure attached to the question we could see that there is no shape given. hence without any shape given in the figure and after rotation we can't obtained a square pyramid.

since, to obtain a image we need a proper figure of the pre-image so that it can be transformed.

hence, the correct answer is:

d) none of the above.

step-by-step explanation: