Can you conclude with a high degree of confidence that the population means for Iowa and New Jersey students are different? A. Because of the extremely low p-value, we cannot reject the null hypothesis with a very high degree of confidence. Hence, the population means for Iowa and New Jersey students are not different. B. Because of the extremely high p-value, we can reject the null hypothesis with a very high degree of confidence. Hence, the population means for Iowa and New Jersey students are different. C. Because of the extremely low p-value, we can reject the null hypothesis with a very high degree of confidence. Hence, the population means for Iowa and New Jersey students are different. D. Because of the extremely high p-value, we cannot reject the null hypothesis with a very high degree of confidence. Hence, the population means for Iowa and New Jersey students are not different.

Complete Question

The complete question is  shown on the first uploaded image

Option A is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that  

  The  95% confidence interval of the mean  score of all  New Jersey third graders  is  (58.957 ,  63.043)

   The sample size is  n =  184

   The sample average is  

   The standard deviation is  

    The  90%  confidence interval for the difference in mean score between lowa and New Jersey is  (-6.33 ,  -1.67 )

   The  p-value is  

Generally given that the p-values is very low compared to the level of significance (100 -90 =  10% = 0.10 )  we can reject the null hypothesis which is usually a  claim that the means of the  population are the same )

Hence the population means are different .

answer: an 8-foot rope is tied from the top of a pole to a

stake in the ground, as shown in the diagram

below

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

se a cavasery6