Enzo is making a scale drawing of the rectangle below. A rectangle has a length of 8 centimeters and width of 5 centimeters.

Enzo says that he can draw an enlarged rectangle that is 16 centimeters by 13 centimeters. Which explains whether Enzo is correct?

Enzo is not correct because he did not multiply the length and width by the same factor.

I do not think Enzo is not correct because he did not multiply the length and width by the same factor.

he is making a  drawing of the rectangle below.

A rectangle has a length of 8 centimeters and width of 5 centimeters.

Suppose a new rectangle will have the length of 16 cm.  

Enzo says that he can draw an enlarged rectangle that is 16 centimeters by 13 centimeters. Enzo is not correct because he did not multiply the length and width by the same factor.

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

we can use this expression to calculate the energy gain as a particle moves with a field or the energy loss as it moves against it. (note that it is also used to define the electron-volt, a unit of energy equal to that gained by an electron as it falls through a pd of 1 v, i.e. w = 1 ev = 1.6 10-19 c 1 v = 1.6 10-19j).in fact this expression is really nothing more than the statement that potential is the potential energy per unit charge. in this case, v= w/qis simply stating that the change in potential energy(or work done) per unit charge is equal to the change in potential (or potential difference), v.student questions: uniform electric fields2electron beamcathode+5 kvanode0 v