A student decided to research primate psychology for their science project. They measured how long it took gorillas to adapt to their new habitat when moved from one zoo to another. They measured how long it took the new gorilla to interact regularly (more than 3 times per day) with the gorillas that already live there. Seven different cases were examined and the data collected. What can be said about the data?

The question is not complete, so i have attached it.

Option A - The data may not be reliable because there is an outlier.

Step-by-step explanation:

Looking at the question attached and the number of the gorrila vis - a - vis the time to interact, we can see that majority of the time to interact falls between 2.5 and 3.4.

However, we have a time of 8.3 days which is for gorrila 3.

This 8.3 is far higher than the range of the other values. Thus, we have an outlier because an outlier is a value is much more smaller or larger than most of the other values in a set of given data.

Thus, the data may not be reliable because there is an outlier.

3 1/3 x 2 3/5 = 8 2/3

step-by-step explanation:

just multiply the first number by the second number to get your answer.

x= -3 and

step-by-step explanation:

to find the roots of a cubic, use division or factoring to find the factors then set equal to 0. as this is a difference of cubes, it factors into

where a is the cube root of .

here   this is 27 and the cube root of 27 is 3. so we write using the form:

.

set each factor to 0 and solve for x.

x-3=0

x=3

the quadratic expression does not factor and must be solved using the quadratic formula.

where a = 1, b=3, and c=9

this cubic has two complex roots.