Can you help me please.

option 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

You use the y-intercept form: y=mx+b

mx=slope, and b=y-intercept.

Looking at this graph, you can see that the slope is -2/3 (rise over run), and the line is negative, so the slope becomes negative.

So now, we can see the only option having the slop -2/3x is option 2.

im pretty sure its

(8,15)

step-by-step explanation:

statement #3: proof- ang is congruent to ang ecd : angles are congruent.  

step-by-step explanation:

1: the missing angles in statement #3  

a.) acb  

reason- the reason why the answer is acb is because angle ecd and angle acb are both the same size *that's what the word congruent means this is really simple.  

2: the missing word in reason #3  

c.) vertical  

reason- the reason why the answer is vertical is because the angles in that diagram on figure 2 is slanted, which is vertical, and the e and a both lay on vertical lines. along with the other's, but e and a are the 2 main points you want to focus on. and c is kind of like your starting point, because c is for both angles, not just one.  

i hope that was and understanding.