Can the two triangles be proven congruent by SAS? Explain. answers: A) Yes. The shared side, image, provides enough information for SAS. B) No. There's only enough information provided for ASA. C) Yes. Angle B and angle D can be assumed to be right angles. D) No. The shared side, image, would provide enough information for SSA, but this is not a congruence theorem.

What is the next step in the given proof? choose the most logical approach. a. statement: m 1 + m 2 + 2(m 3) = 180° reason: angle addition b. statement: m 1 + m 3 = m 2 + m 3 reason: transitive property of equality c. statement: m 1 = m 2 reason: subtraction property of equality d. statement: m 1 + m 2 = m 2 + m 3 reason: substitution property of equality e. statement: 2(m 1) = m 2 + m 3 reason: substitution property of equality