This table shows the population of owls in a park in different years. The quadratic regression equation that models these data is
y=-1.347 + 10.75x-11.3.
х
Year
y
Number of
owls
1
0
2.
2
3
17
4.
14
5
9
6
4
Using this model, the predicted number of owls in year 9 is about -
23. Does this prediction make sense? Why or why not?
O A. Yes, because the owl population is endangered.
O B. No, because the owls went to live somewhere else.
C. No, because you can't have a negative number of owls.
O D. Yes, because that is the result of substituting x = 9.

the answer to your question a or b but i am pretty sure it is b. i hope this : )

step-by-step explanation:

answer set (b) 0.5, 3/4 80% is in order from least to greatest.  

step-by-step explanation:

in order to compare rational numbers to each other, it is much easier if they are in the same form.   typically, the best form in which to evaluate rational numbers is in decimals.   in order to convert a percent to a decimal, you would divide the given percentage by 100.   you can also accomplish the conversion by moving the decimal point over two places to the left.   for example, the decimal value of 80% is 80/100, or 0.8.   in order to convert a fraction to a decimal, you need to divide the numerator by the denominator.   for example, 3/4 is 0.75.   so, for choice (b) 0.5 3/4 (0.75), 80% (0.8) is the only choice in which the numbers are in order from least to greatest.  

hi how are you doing today? if you ever need just tell me

step-by-step explanation: