Vance used the associative property to write (4.5 m + StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction) minus 9 as the equivalent expression 4.5 m (StartFraction 7 Over 8 EndFraction minus 9). Did Vance apply the associative property correctly? Why or why not?

Consider this equation. |y + 6| = 2 what can be concluded of the equation? check all that apply. there will be one solution. there will be two solutions. the solution to –(y + 6) = 2 will be also be a solution to the given absolute value equation. the solution(s) will be the number(s) on the number line 2 units away from –6. the value of y must be positive since the variable is inside absolute value signs.