For the years between 1990 and 2009, the regression equation yˆ=0.15x+3.95 models the minimum wage, where x is the number of years after 1990.

Which statement is the best interpretation of the slope? Which statement is the best interpretation of the y-intercept? Select both correct responses.

Question 3 options:

The minimum wage increased by $0.15 per year.

The minimum wage in 1990 was $4.10.

The minimum wage increased by $0.15 every 4 years.

The minimum wage in 2000 was $3.95.

The minimum wage in 1990 was $0.15.

The minimum wage increased by $3.95 per year.

The minimum wage in 1990 was $3.95.

1.) The minimum wage increased by $0.15 per year.

5.) The minimum wage in 1990 was $0.15.

7.) The minimum wage in 1990 was $3.95.

Step-by-step explanation:

given that the years between 1990 and 2009, the regression equation yˆ=0.15x+3.95 models the minimum wage.

where x = 19 years

The slope = 0.15

The intercept = 3.95

The best statement for interpretation of the slope and interpretation of the y-intercept are:

1.) The minimum wage increased by $0.15 per year.

5.) The minimum wage in 1990 was $0.15.

7.) The minimum wage in 1990 was $3.95.

i think the answer is seven, for if i'm being useless °ω°

step-by-step explanation:

$25

step-by-step explanation:

25 - 4.50 = 20.5

20.5 / 2 = 10.25

10.25 + 10 = 20.25

20.25 - 12.50 = 7.75

therefore the answer is $25 as shown as the first number.