Jacki evaluated the expression below.

2 cubed (3 minus 1) + 4 (8 minus 12) = 2 cubed (2) + 4 (4) = 8 (2) + 16 = 16 + 16 = 32.

What was Jacki’s error?
Jacki should have simplified the exponent first.
Jacki should have multiplied 4 and 8 first.
Jacki did not subtract 12 from 8 correctly.
Jacki should not have multiplied 8 and 2.

tube or goog would be a great resource to with that question

the smallest possible measurement of the width is 14 feet

step-by-step explanation:

let's assume length of parallelogram is 'l'

width of parallelogram is 'w'

the perimeter of a parallelogram must be no less than 40 feet

so, we get

we are given

length of parallelogram is 6 feet

so,

l=6

we can plug it

now, we can solve for w

subtract both sides by 12

divide both sides by 2

and we get

so,

the smallest possible measurement of the width is 14 feet

2x + 8

step-by-step explanation:

oh

nu stiu chiar nu stiu sa o fac