Which of the following is an irrational number?

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

Can some one me with these questions

Complete each statement from the information given and the triangle criterion you used. if the triangles cannot be shown to be congruent, leave the box for the second triangle blank and choose for reason “cannot be determined.” carbon - regular hexagon. ∆can ≅ ∆ by