subject
Mathematics, 21.03.2020 02:11 comeonmanim

After a political ad campaign, pollsters check the president's negatives. They test the hypothesis that the ads produced no change against the alternative that the negatives are now below 54% and find a p-value of 0.038.

Which conclusion is appropriate? Explain.

A- There is a 3.8% chance that the ads work.

B- There is 96.2% chance that the ad works.

C- There is a 3.8% chance that natural sampling variation could produce poll results at least as far below 54% as these if there is really no change in public opinion.

D- There is 3.8% chance that the poll they conduct ed is correct.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:30
The label on the car's antifreeze container claims to protect the car between ? 40°c and 125°c. to convert celsius temperature to fahrenheit temperature, the formula is c = 5 over 9 (f ? 32). write and solve the inequality to determine the fahrenheit temperature range at which this antifreeze protects the car. ? 40 > 5 over 9 (f ? 32) > 125; ? 40 > f > 257 ? 40 < 5 over 9 (f ? 32) < 125; ? 40 < f < 257 ? 40 < 5 over 9 (f ? 32); ? 40 < f 5 over 9 (f ? 32) < 125; f < 257
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:30
Find the zero function by factoring (try to show work) h(x)=-x^2-6x-9
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:00
How many real-number solutions does the equation have? -4x^2 + 10x + 6 = 0 a. no solutions b. two solutions c. infinitely many solutions d. one solution
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 22:00
Which word in the sentence below is an interrogative pronoun? who is picking us up from school? whousisfrom
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
After a political ad campaign, pollsters check the president's negatives. They test the hypothesis t...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363