A textbook company claims that their book is so engaging that less than 55% of students read it. If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted?

a. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that less than 55% of students read this text
b. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that less than 55% of students read this text
c. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that no more than 55% of students read this text
d. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that no more than 55% of students read this text

answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

so i think that is helping you to understand. so the answer is b

stew reads at the fastest rate of 265 words per minute.

step-by-step explanation:

it's a given that felicia reads at 260 word per minute and on connie's graph we can see that she reads 200 words per minute. since stew's table tells us that he read 795 in 3 minutes, we can divide 795 by 3 to find out how many words he reads per minute.

795/3 = 265

stew reads 265 words per minute - he reads at the fastest rate since felecia reads at 260 words per minute and connie reads at 200 words per minute.

stew (265) > felecia (260) > connie (200)