The figure shows a pair of parallel line segments on a coordinate grid:

(picture)

The line segments are translated 2 units to the right to form E'F' and G'H'. Which statement describes E'F' and G'H'?

A) Line segments E'F' and G'H' do not intersect and are closer together than EF and GH.
B) Line segments E'F' and G'H' intersect at (−2, 0) and are two times farther apart than EF and GH.
C) Line segments E'F' and G'H' intersect at (0, −2) and are two times closer together than EF and GH.
D) Line segments E'F' and G'H' do not intersect and are the same distance apart as EF and GH.

D

Step-by-step explanation:

process of elimination

A) they are not closer

B) they dont intersect

C) they dont intersect

D) checks out and it correct

step-by-step explanation:

30% of $420 is 0.30($420) = $126 and $420 + $126 = $546.

or, 130% of $420 is 1.3($420) = $546.

notice that this is not the $600 original list price with which we started.

why doesn't this work?

the method does not work because 30% of $420 is not the same amount as the 30% of $600. it may seem obvious when stated this way, but it is a very common error made on problems of this type. we cannot just use the same percent and get back to the original amount because we are taking that percent of a different value.

to work problems of this type correctly, it is generally best to write an equation for the situation and then solve.

example: since (100% – 30%)(original price) = (sale price)

70% of the   (original price) is $420.

0.7x   = 420

equation image indicator

x = 600

the original cost was $600.

we may also solve this problem using the two-step method. working the problem in two steps requires us to use more algebra skills. we have to know that x = 1x (identity property of multiplicationtext annotation indicator) and that 1x – 0.3x = 0.7x (subtracting like terms). then we solve the problem as follows:

(original price) – 30%(original price) = sale price

x – 0.3x = 420

0.7x = $420

equation image indicator

x = 600

the original cost was $600.  

note that with both of the above methods we do obtain the correct original amount.

example: after a 5% pay raise, hermione is earning $22,680 per year. what was she earning before the pay raise?

105% of (original salary) = current salary

1.05x = 22,680

equation image indicator

x = 21,600

hermione earned $21,600 per year before the pay raise.

this is an example so maybe you will get how to at least do it!

i just took the test, the correct answer is .. 31.5 in.