John says the transformation rule (x, y) Right-arrow (x + 4, y + 7) can be used to describe the slide of the pre-image (4, 5) to the image (0, –2). What was his error?

Sample Response:The pre-image is the point you start with. To check the transformation rule, substitute the values of the coordinates (4, 5) into the rule. You get (4, 5) → (4+4, 5+7). Simplify to get (4, 5) → (8, 12). This is the image. Instead the rule was applied to the image. This is the source of the error.

Step-by-step explanation:

The pre-image is the point you start with. To check the transformation rule, substitute the values of the coordinates (4, 5) into the rule. You get (4, 5) → (4+4, 5+7). Simplify to get (4, 5) → (8, 12). This is the image. Instead the rule was applied to the image. This is the source of the error.

the correct answer option is (2x-3)(2x+3).

step-by-step explanation:

we are given the following expression and we are to factorize it:

we are to find such factors that when multiplied they give a result of 36 (9 x 4 = 36) and when added they give a result of 0.

the two such factors of 36 are negative six and postive six.

factorizing the given expression to get:

therefore, the correct factorization of is (2x-3)(2x+3).

yes

step-by-step explanation:

so of course you want to start by plugging the 5 in which goes to 7(5)+3(5)=50 because 7*5=35 and 3*5=15 and then add them together, then plug in the 5 to the other equation as well 9(5)+5=50 because 9*5= 45 and then add 5 and so yes they are equivalent.