Consider an individual with a current income of $40,000 that is considering committing a crime that has a payoff of $20,000 and a fine of $20,000 if the individual is caught. Based on the standard Becker criminal decision rule, which of the probabilities of getting caught listed below is the highest probability that would still give the individual incentive to commit the crime?

, and

for

step-by-step explanation:

we can analyze the pattern at which the terms increase. let us denote , , , so that we can call

note the following:

the pattern: to get the next term value, we just add the next term number (e.g. 1st, 2nd, to the previous term value (term values are the given numbers in the question, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15,

from , to get to , we add

from , to get to , we add

etc.

we need to form a recursive formula, a formula that has the next term as a function of the previous term. so a possible recursive formula can be

, and for

20days louise can read300 pg

step-by-step explanation:

1 day 15 pg 300: 15= 20

x day 300 pg