More unusual points each of the following scatterplots shows a cluster of points and one 'stray" point. for each, answerthese questions: 1) in what way is the point unusual? does it have high leverage, a large residual. or both? 2) do you think that point is an influential point? 3) if that point were removed, would the correlation become stronger or weaker? explain.4) if that point were removed, would the slope of the regression line increase or decrease? explain. figure: cluster of points

rick has $1400 and sally has $1500

step-by-step explanation:

to find amount of money rick has after 10 years :

principal = $1000 , time = 10 years , rate = 4% annually

to find amount of money sally has after 10 years :

her friend gives to pay her $50 per year, therefore money she has after 10 years = 50 × 10 = $500

also, sally gets $1000 after 10 years,

therefore, total amount of money sally has after 10 years = 500 + 1000 = $1500

so, after 10 years : rick has $1400 and sally has $1500

whole numbers.

step-by-step explanation:

we are given the average monthly rainfall (in millimeters) model r(m) for the years 1900-2009 as a function of the month number m.

as we can see m is taken for the number of months for years 1900-2009.

we know that number of months can't be a negative number or decimal number or a fraction.

so, the number of months could be only positive whole numbers.

therefore, whole numbers is more appropriate for the domain of r.

7

step-by-step explanation: