Abicycle manufacturing company makes a particular type of bike. each child bike requires 4 hours to build and 4 hours to test c e que tous

build and 4 hours to test. with the number of workers, the company is able to have up to 120 hours of building time and 100 hours of testing in the

represents child bikes and a represents adult bikes, determine which system of inequality best explans whether the company and tes and 150

bikes in the week

no, because the bike order does not meet the restrictions of 40 + 6a s 120 and 4c + 4a s 100

no, because the bike order does not meet the restrictions of 40 + 4a s 120 and 6c + 4a 5 100

yes, because the bike order meets the restrictions of 40 + 6a s 120 and 4c + 4a s 100

yes, because the bike order meets the restrictions of 40 + 4a s 120 and 6c + 4a 5 100

As the question is unable to be understood/incomplete hence let's discuss the complete question (most probable question) and the answer for that.

Updated Question:

"A bicycle manufacturing company makes a particular type of bike. Each child bike requires 4 hours to build and 4 hours to test. Each adult bike requires 6 hours to build and 4 hours to test. With the number of workers, the company is able to have up to 120 hours of building time and 100 hours of testing time for a week. If c represents child bikes and a represents adult bikes, determine which system of inequality best explains whether the company can build 20 child bikes and 6 adult bikes in the week. No, because the bike order does not meet the restrictions of 4c + 6a ≤ 120 and 4c + 4a ≤ 100 No, because the bike order does not meet the restrictions of 4c + 4a ≤ 120 and 6c + 4a ≤ 100 Yes, because the bike order meets the restrictions of 4c + 6a ≤ 120 and 4c + 4a ≤ 100 Yes, because the bike order meets the restrictions of 4c + 4a ≤ 120 and 6c + 4a ≤ 100"

Correct answer for this question is first option because it satisfies the first inequality but not the second one.

Step by Step Explanation:

First Inequality:

4(20)+6(6)≤120

80+36≤120

116≤120 ⇒ TRUE

Second Inequality:

4(20)+4(6)≤100

80+24≤100

104≤100 ⇒ FALSE

the final price would be 29.6925

step-by-step explanation:

39.59 minus 25% equals 29.6925