In the article "attitudes about marijuana and political views" (psychological reports, 1973), researchers reported on the use of cannabis by liberals and conservatives during the 1970s. to test the claim (at 1% significance) that the proportion of voters who smoked cannabis frequently was lower among conservatives, the hypotheses were suppose that we conduct a hypothesis test in which a type ii error is very serious. but the type i error is not very serious. which level of significance is the best choice?

there is no question content here, but you for the free points! : d

the population of other specie of birds will decline or other specie of birds will find some alternate source of food to survive.

explanation:

according to the competitive exclusion principle, which is also known as gause's law, two specie living in the same niche and feeding on the same resource cannot co-exist stably.

as we have well studied the theory of natural selection which states that only those organisms survive which have better tendency to compete for food and adapt to the environmental conditions.

coming towards the question, what wi ll happen when one species outcompetes the other for the small fish , the other specie will not get enough food and will start to die or decline in population. eventually either other specie needs to find another alternative food source for itself or migrate at some other location where there is less competition otherwise it will just not exist anymore at that niche.

hope it !

there are no answer choices

step-by-step explanation: