Another student was upset for a diferent reason. he thought that test 2 was too long and said reason. he thought that test 2 was too long and said, "at least half of the significance level of o.01, test the student's claim that at least half of the students were still taking the (18 pts) class was stll testing when there were only 10 minutes left! " (students are allowed 90 minutes to complete the test at the 80-minute mark. one of the mat 110 instructors thought that test 2 was easier than test 1. she said, "i think students scored a lot higher on the second test." can you conclude at a o.05 level of significance that the scores for test 2 were higher than for test 1? (18 pts) united states