Given: circle o; angle a intercepts arc b c d ; angle d intercepts arc b c prove: angle a is-congruent-to angle d two statements are missing reasons. what reason can be used to justify both statements 2 and 3? statements reasons 1. circle o; angle a intercepts arc b c. angle d intercects arc b c 1. given 2. measure of angle a = one-half (measure of arc b c) 2. ? 3. measure of angle d = one-half (measure of arc b c) 3. ? 4. measure of angle a = measure of angle d 4. substitution property 5. angle a is-congruent-to angle d 5. definition of congruent angles inscribed angles theorem third corollary to the inscribed angles theorem central angle of a triangle has the same measure as its intercepted arc. angle formed by a tangent and a chord is half the measure of the intercepted arc.

well there are two answers for that.

1: you need 120 ones then that will equal up to 120.

2: you could also do one 100 and 2 tens.

those are the answers that i have thought of.

step-by-step explanation:

we can use this expression to calculate the energy gain as a particle moves with a field or the energy loss as it moves against it. (note that it is also used to define the electron-volt, a unit of energy equal to that gained by an electron as it falls through a pd of 1 v, i.e. w = 1 ev = 1.6 10-19 c 1 v = 1.6 10-19j).in fact this expression is really nothing more than the statement that potential is the potential energy per unit charge. in this case, v= w/qis simply stating that the change in potential energy(or work done) per unit charge is equal to the change in potential (or potential difference), v.student questions: uniform electric fields2electron beamcathode+5 kvanode0 v