Amajor issue facing many states is whether to legalize casino gambling. suppose the governor of one state believes that more than 55% of the state's registered voters would favor some form of legal casino gambling. however, before backing a proposal to allow such gambling, the governor has instructed his aides to conduct a statistical test on the issue. to do this, the aides have hired a consulting firm to survey a simple random sample of 300 voters in the state. of these 300 voters, 175 actually favored legalized gambling. state the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses.

Null hypothesis Uo = 165

Alternative Hypothesis U1 > 165

Step-by-step explanation:

Null hypothesis = 55% of registered voters

In this case we sampled on 300 voters

55/100 × 300= 165voters

Null hypothesis Uo= 165

That is 165 out of 300 voters will favour legalized gambling.

Alternative Hypothesis U1 > 165

That is more than 165 out of 300 voters will favour legalized gambling.

unpaid balance is : $149.99-$50 = $99.99 new balance = 149.99+2.62-50 = $102.61 finance charge = 99.99- 0.21/12= $1.75 new balance = 99.99+1.75 = $101.74 average daily balance method average daily balance= 3399.70/30 = $113.32 finance charge = $ 0.21/12ă—113.32 = $1.98 new balance = $149.99-50+1.98 = $101.97

last one.

step-by-step explanation:

last one.

generally speaking, the others follow some sort of pattern that correlates to either linear (looks like a straight line) or sinusoidal (looks like an s).

the last one is just a random cloud of points that doesn't correlate to any particular known order.