Vera claimed the solution set on the number line represents the inequality - 78. 2x
-82
-81
-80
-79
-78
which error did vera make?
o vera wrote the inequality with the variable on the left side of the relation symbol.
vera wrote a relation symbol that does not represent the direction of the ray.
vera selected an inequality that does not include -79 in its solution set.
vera used the wrong number in her inequality

Given: lines a and b are parallel and line c is a transversal. prove: 2 is supplementary to 8 what is the missing reason in the proof? statement reason 1. a || b, is a transv 1. given 2. ∠6 ≅ ∠2 2. ? 3. m∠6 = m∠2 3. def. of congruent 4. ∠6 is supp. to ∠8 4. def. of linear pair 5. ∠2 is supp. to ∠8 5. congruent supplements theorem corresponding angles theorem alternate interior angles theorem vertical angles theorem alternate exterior angles theorem