Need

michael and derrick each completed a separate proof to show that corresponding angles akg and elk are congruent. who completed the proof incorrectly? explain.

michael's proof

statement justification
1. line ab ∥ line ef with transversal segment gj 1. given
2. angle akg is congruent to angle akl 2. vertical angles theorem
3. angle bkl is congruent to angle elk 3. alternate interior angles theorem
4. angle akg is congruent to angle elk 4. transitive property

derrick's proof

statement justification
1. line ab ∥ line ef with transversal segment gj 1. given
2. angle akg is congruent to angle bkl 2. vertical angles theorem
3. angle bkl is congruent to angle elk 3. alternate interior angles theorem
4. angle akg is congruent to angle elk 4. transitive property