The "absorption law" (theorem 2.1.1 in our book) states that p v (p aq) is logically equivalent to p. construct a truth table to show these statements are equivalent.

step-by-step explanation:

12: 00 p.m. to 7: 00 p.m. is a total of 7 hours.

4: 00 p.m. to 7: 00 p.m. is a total of 3 hours.

this means that from 4: 00 p.m to 7: 00 p.m. this represents 3/7 of what was lost from 12: 00 p.m. to 7: 00 p.m.

after knowing this, after doing 11,600 - 6,800 = 4,800

4,800 represents 3/7 of what was lost for 7 hours.

we then divide 4,800 by 3 which gets 1,600.

because we know that 1,600 represents 1/7 of how much water was lost, we just have to multiply by 7, which gets 11,200.   after adding 11,200 to how much water was left at 7: 00 p.m. which was 6,800. 11,200 + 6,800 = 18,000

this means that the pool originally had 18,000 gallons in the pool.

you can also check your work by doing 18,000 - 4(1600), which becomes           1800 - 6400 which gets you 11,600.

which would be true for stem changing verbs?

they have a consistent spelling change in the stem of the verb.

what is different about the verb “venir” as compared to other stem-changing verbs?

only the third person forms have a stem change.

which of the following could not be considered a “stem-changing” verb?

querer

which of the following would not be condsidered an event?

desfile

what word could be used in response to the following?

¿qué quieres comprar?

quero

what word could be used in response to the following?

¿dónde uds. pueden ir?

vamos  

ellos ir al centro comercial.

yo comprar un vestido.

pedimos

dónde tú?

dormes

step-by-step explanation: