Using a type of logic known as a generalized conclusion can often be drawn from a large number of specific observations.

There are different kinds of logical reasoning, two of the most known are the deductive reasoning and the inductive reasoning.

In the deductive reasoning we come to a conclusion by giving previous statements, as in this example.

Premise 1: All birds has wings.

Premise 2: The chicken is a bird.

Conclusion: The chicken has wings.

By the other hand, in the inductive reasoning we came to a conclusion by a series of previous observations, coming from specific cases to a general case. As in this example.

Premise 1: The brown cat has a tail.

Premise 2: The black cat has a tail

Premise 3: The white cat has a tail.

Conclusion: All cats have tails.

For the inductive reasoning to be accurate, there must be a large number of premises (observations).

So, the answer would be inductive reasoning

inductive reasoning

Step-by-step explanation:

26?

step-by-step explanation:

you probably already have the answer but anyways it's b. 15.0

step-by-step explanation: