In ms. polakoski's statistics class the mean score on the final exam is 78 points with a standard deviation of 8 points. carl was enrolled in ms. polakoski's class. his score on the final exam was 89.2. in mr. curtis' statistics class the mean score on the final exam is 82 points with a standard deviation of 4 points. ray was enrolled in mr. curtis' class. his score on the final exam was 87.6. who performed better on the final exam relative to their classmates?

On the final exam, Ray and Carl had an equal performance relative to their classmates.

Step-by-step explanation:

This problem can be solved by looking at the z-score of Carl and Ray. Whoever has the highest z-score performed better on the final exam relative to their classmates.

The Z score formula is given by:

In which: X is the grade we are going to find the z-score of, is the mean score and is the standard deviation.

Carl:

His score on the final exam was 89.2, so .

The mean score on the final exam is 78, so

With a standard deviation of 8 points, so

Carl's z-score is:

Now, we look into the z-table. The p-value of is .9192, which means that Carl perfored better than 91.92% of his classmates.

Ray:

His score on the final exam was 87.6, so

The mean score on the final exam is 82 points, so

With a standard deviation of 4 points, so

Ray's z-score is:

Now, we look into the z-table. The p-value of is .9192, which means that Ray also perfored better than 91.92% of his classmates.

On the final exam, Ray and Carl had an equal performance relative to their classmates.

perimeter of the first rectangular board is 9 feet.

step-by-step explanation:

let p = perimeter of first board.

l = length of first board

w = width of first board

length of first board = 2 * width of first board - 3

l = 2w - 3

perimeter of first board = 2l + 2w

since l = 2w-3, then

p = 2*(2w-3) + 2w which equals 4w-6 + 2w which equals 6w-6

length and width of the second board are reciprocals of corresponding length and width of the first board.

length of second board = 1/(2w-3)

width of second board = 1/w

perimeter of second board is 1/5th perimeter of the first board.

perimeter of second board = p/5

perimeter of the second board = (2/(2w-3) + 2/w)

since the perimeter of the first board is 5 times the perimeter of the second board, this means that:

6w-6 = 5*(2/(2w-3) + 2/w)

which is the same as:

6w-6 = (10/(2w-3) + 10/w)

if we multiply both sides of this equation by (2w-3), we get:

(6w-6)*(2w-3) = 10 + 10*(2w-3)/w

if we multiply both sides of this equation by w, we get:

(6w-6)*(2w-3)*w = 10*w + 10*(2w-3)

we can simplify this to become:

(6w-6)*(2w-3)*w = 10w + 20w - 30

which becomes:

(6w-6)*(2w-3)*w = 30w-30

if we divide both sides of this equation by (6w-6), we get:

(2w-3)*w = (30w-30)/(6w-6)

which becomes:

(2w-3)*w = 5

this can be simplified to:

2w^2 - 3w = 5

subtract 5 from both sides of this equation to get:

2w^2 - 3w - 5 = 0

which can be factored into:

(2w-5)*(w+1) = 0

which makes:

w = 5/2

or

w = -1.

w can't be negative so the only possible answer is w = 5/2.

if w = 5/2, then

p = 2w-3 = 5-3 = 2

we have:

p = 2

w = 5/2

p = 2l + 2w gets p = 4 + 5 = 9

the perimeter of the first board is 9 feet.

since the perimeter of the second board is 1/5 the perimeter of the first board, the perimeter of the second board is 9/5.

to see if that's correct, we substitute known values for l and w into the second board.

the length of the second board is 1/l.

this becomes 1/2.

the width of the second board is 1/w

this bgecomes 1/(5/2) = (2/5)

let l2 = length of second board.

let w2 = width of second board.

l2 = (1/2)

w2 = (2/5)

let p2= perimeter of second board.

then p2 = 9/5

since p2 = 2*l2 + 2*w2, we should get p2 = 9/5 using the dimensions of l2 and w2.

2 * l2 = 2 * (1/2) = 1

2 * w2 = 2 * (2/5) = 4/5

1 is the same as 5/5

5/5 + 4/5 = 9/5

p2 checks out good.

the dimensions as given are good.

answer to the problem is:

perimeter of the first rectangular board is 9 feet.

step-by-step explanation: