Suppose that a researcher, using data on 150 randomly selected bicycles, estimates the ols regression: modifyingabove price with caret equals 672.65 minus 1.98 times weight, (191.4) (0.42) where price measures the price of the i superscript th bike in dollars and weight measures the weight of the i superscript th bike in kilograms

32

step-by-step explanation:

< xcy ≅ < xby

step-by-step explanation:

in δcax and δbax,

so, δcax ≅ δbax (side-angle-side or sas)

since δcax ≅ δbax, we can conclude < acx ≅ < abx

in δacy and δaby,

so, δacy ≅ δaby (side-angle-side or sas)

since δacy ≅ δaby, we can conclude < acy ≅ < aby

now,

< acy ≅ < aby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < abx + < xby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < acx + < xby   (since < acx ≅ < abx already proved above)

subtracting < acx from both sides, we get

< acx + < xcy -< acx ≅ < acx + < xby -< acx

cancelling out < acx and -< acx from both sides, we get

< xcy ≅ < xby (proved)

hit or miss i guess they never miss huh

step-by-step explanation:

you got a boyfriend i bet he doesnt kiss ya