According to a report, 51.6% of murders are committed with a firearm. (a) if 200 murders are randomly selected, how many would we expect to be committed with a firearm? (b) would it be unusual to observe 122 murders by firearm in a random sample of 200 murders? why?

a) 103, b) No

Step-by-step explanation:

a) We need to multiply the probability by the amount of the sample to get:

200 × 51.6% = 103.2, rounded down to 103

b) As we have selected the people randomly, we have no control over the type of people we are given - this is theoretical and the estimate is not definite - all of the sample could have murdered by firearm or even none (even though it is highly unlikely).

what do you need me to answer?

step-by-step explanation:

let's add {f(x)=x+1}f(x)=x+1 and {g(x)=2x}g(x)=2x together to make a new function.

f(x)+g(x) =(x+1)+(2x)=x+1+2x=3x+1

let's call this new function hh. so we have:

{h(x)}={f(x)}+{g(x)}{=3x+1}h(x)=f(x)+g(x)=3x+1

we can also evaluate combined functions for particular inputs. let's evaluate function hh above for x=2x=2. below are two ways of doing this.

method 1: substitute x=2x=2 into the combined function hh.

h(x)

h(2)

​    

=3x+1

=3(2)+1

=7

​ since h(x)=f(x)+g(x)h(x)=f(x)+g(x), we can also find h(2)h(2) by finding f(2) +g(2)f(2)+g(2).

first, let's find f(2)f(2):

f(x)

f(2)

​    

=x+1

=2+1

=3

​  

now, let's find g(2)g(2):

g(x)

g(2)

​    

=2x

=2⋅2

=4

​  

so f(2)+g(2)=3+4=\greend7f(2)+g(2)=3+4=7.

notice that substituting x =2x=2 directly into function hh and finding f(2) + g(2)f(2)+g(2) gave us the same answer!