Michael draws three parallelograms. in each figure, he measures a pair of angles, as shown. which conjecture is reasonable for michael to make? in a parallelogram, consecutive angles are supplementary. in a parallelogram, all angles are congruent. in a parallelogram, consecutive angles are congruent. in a parallelogram, consecutive angles are complementary.

In a parallelogram, consecutive

angles are supplementary

a framing bias

step-by-step explanation:

rodrigo is subject to a framing bias i believe.

the smallest possible measurement of the width is 14 feet

step-by-step explanation:

let's assume length of parallelogram is 'l'

width of parallelogram is 'w'

the perimeter of a parallelogram must be no less than 40 feet

so, we get

we are given

length of parallelogram is 6 feet

so,

l=6

we can plug it

now, we can solve for w

subtract both sides by 12

divide both sides by 2

and we get

so,

the smallest possible measurement of the width is 14 feet