The figure shows two parallel lines kl and no cut by the transversals ko and ln: which statement best explains the relationship between triangle klm and triangle onm? triangle klm is similar to triangle onm because measure of angle 3 equals measure of angle 4 and measure of angle 1 equals measure of angle 5 triangle klm is similar to triangle onm because measure of angle 3 equals measure of angle 6 and measure of angle 1 equals measure of angle 4 triangle klm is congruent to triangle onm because measure of angle 3 equals measure of angle 4 and measure of angle 1 equals measure of angle 5 triangle klm is congruent to triangle onm because measure of angle 3 equals measure of angle 6 and measure of angle 1 equals measure of angle 4

Triangle KLM is congruent to triangle ONM.

Step-by-step explanation:

All three angles of triangles are equal, that is both triangles are congruent.

Please share the figure to show the numbering of angle you are using. So that I can describe you which angle is equal to which one.

3/4 ÷ 3/4

step-by-step explanation:

basically divide any proper fraction with itself to fit the criteria.

so if we are using 3/4, then:

3/4 ÷ 3/4 = 1

so 1 is the quotient.

and the numerators for both these fractions is 3.   and if we divide the numerators:

3 ÷ 3 = 1

we see that quotient is equal to our original quotient as well.

34.5 cm

step-by-step explanation:

generally for a circular segment of angle, θ° and radius r

arc length

= (θ/360) x circumference

= (θ/360) x 2πr

in our case, θ = 60°, π=3.142 and r = 33 cm

substitute into above formula

arc length

= (60/360) x 2(3.142)( 33) = 34.5 cm